Hey Democrats, Book a Charter Flight to Mexico City
Rusty
If Democrats want to see how to stand up for democracy, they need to book a charter flight to Mexico City so they can see how it's done.
Standing Up To Traitors 101
In response to President Fox's hypocritical warning that, "Whoever attacks our laws and institutions also attacks our history and Mexico," opposition lawmakers took over the stage in Congress, waving Mexican flags and holding placards calling Fox a traitor to democracy."
Fox's designated heir and his corrupt cronies are the ones attacking Mexican laws and institutions, and Vicente Fox damn well knows it.
"Mexican lawmakers ignored demands that they return to their seats, shouting "Vote by Vote" -- a rallying cry for Lopez Obrador's bid for a full recount in the election.
They raised up leather-bound copies of the Mexican Constitution and flashed the victory sign.
I would have suggested flashing a different kind of sign that would have required only half as many fingers, but other than that, these heroes of Mexican democracy are doing just fine.
Are you taking notes, Nancy Pelosi? Can I chip in a few dollars to help you pay for that charter flight to Maxico City, Harry Reid?
In contrast to dramatic action in Mexico City, here in the birthplace of democracy, Democratic lawmakers seem to think they're bold champions of freedom by manuevering for a meaningless vote of no confidence in Donald Rumsfeld.
This man, who shook hands with the Butcher of Baghdad and has become the new Butcher of Baghdad, is a traitor to American democracy. He is a war criminal in a regime of war criminals, and must be confronted with much more than a feeble no confidence vote.
Do Democrats seriously think that's going to force Bush to fire Rumsfeld? If it does, I'll convert to Buddhism, light a candle for peace atop the highest mountain peak in Tibet, and sweep monastery floors for the rest of my life. I'd miss feline, but maybe she'd write me now and then.
But I digress.
When are Democrats in Washington finally going to realize who they are dealing with? Republicans have subverted three national elections in a row, so they're not going to subvert this one?
It will undoubtedly shock the DNC, DCCC, and DSCC when they discover late on election night that they came oh so close but didn't quite take back the House or Senate. Theyll spend the next two years blaming each other when they're not busy blaming Howard Dean, for after all, who among them could have foreseen Republicans crashing Diebold machines into our Constitution four elections in a row?
How many times are Democrats going to run up to that football Rove has teed up, only to watch him yank it away at the last second? How many times are they going to let that happen before they START KICKING HIM INSTEAD?
If Democrats had the moral courage America needs so desperately right now, they would fill the House and Senate chambers, holding up "Republicans are Traitors" placards and shut down the government until Bush fires Rove's ass, fires Rumsfeld's ass, fires Rice's ass, and demands Cheney's resignation.
They won't do that of course. It would require that elusive quality known as moral courage. It's much easier to savor encouraging polls, while avoiding any serious thoughts about yet another election night fiasco, courtesy of Rove's magic modem and several thousand rigged central tabulators.
Comment # 1 ~ feline ~ 08/20/2006 22:49 GMT Rusty, thank you so much for addressing this issue that could affect voters in Missouri and the outcome of the election in November. We need all of the Democratic seats we can get in the House and the Senate, and we need to allow ALL voters to participate in the democratic process - not just those who can afford to obtain an I.D. before the election, or who reside in affluent counties who will provide the funding.
SNIP
The lawsuit claims the Voter I.D. Law violates the section of the Missouri Constitution known as the "Hancock Amendment," which provides that "the state is prohibited from requiring any new or expanded activities by counties and other political subdivisions without full state financing." The Amendment also provides that "a new activity or service ... shall not be required by the General Assembly or any state agency of counties or other political subdivisions, unless a state appropriation is made and dispersed to pay the county or other political subdivision for any increased cost."
END SNIP
Voters in Missouri have the consitutionally protected right to replace the unresponsive Republicans who have rubber-stamped the policies and agendas of Bush and Cheney. They are not working for their constituents and Americans; they are working for corporate profiteers. Some have said they've "distanced themselves from Bush"; yet they continue to support the war in Iraq, and illegal programs implemented in the "war on terror".
There is so much happening so fast right before the election, and with so little time left, it's extremely important that concerned citizens follow ongoing litigation and changes.
Thanks again!
Comment # 2 ~ feline ~ 08/20/2006 23:16 GMT Rusty, thank you so much for addressing this issue that could affect voters in Missouri and the outcome of the election in November. We need all of the Democratic seats we can get in the House and the Senate, and we need to allow ALL voters to participate in the democratic process - not just those who can afford to obtain an I.D. before the election, or who reside in affluent counties who will provide the funding.
SNIP
The lawsuit claims the Voter I.D. Law violates the section of the Missouri Constitution known as the "Hancock Amendment," which provides that "the state is prohibited from requiring any new or expanded activities by counties and other political subdivisions without full state financing." The Amendment also provides that "a new activity or service ... shall not be required by the General Assembly or any state agency of counties or other political subdivisions, unless a state appropriation is made and dispersed to pay the county or other political subdivision for any increased cost."
END SNIP
Voters in Missouri have the consitutionally protected right to replace the unresponsive Republicans who have rubber-stamped the policies and agendas of Bush and Cheney. They are not working for their constituents and Americans; they are working for corporate profiteers. Some have said they've "distanced themselves from Bush"; yet they continue to support the war in Iraq, and illegal programs implemented in the "war on terror".
There is so much happening so fast right before the election, and with so little time left, it's extremely important that concerned citizens follow ongoing litigation and changes.
Thanks again!
Comment # 3 ~ feline ~ 08/20/2006 23:17 GMT Oops!
P.S. Refreshing the page reposts a comment...I need to remember to stop doing that!
Comment # 4 ~ Alma ~ 08/20/2006 23:23 GMT Very powerful article that everyone should read.
Comment # 5 ~ tahoebasha1 ~ 08/20/2006 23:43 GMT Rusty, thank you and thank you for bringing Michael C. Ruppert's article “By the Light of a Burning Bridge” to our attention. I read the entire article. No one on earth could blame this man for his decision and one, I would consider, a wise one. Having lived the life he did where he, personally, viewed outrage and activism, he warns us about the acquiescence that has so prevailed in our current dilemna. Still, he makes efforts -- from afar. He so clairvoyantly reveals the "true" progression of this country in it's path to destruction that it's hard to believe that there are those many who still do not understand.
He mentions Israel and it's government and policies, which he does not condone. I don't feel I am adequately abreast to say whether or not their policies have been/are good or bad -- probably, a little of both. On that, I can only say one thing, I think that Israel after years and years of terrorism upon it would wish for just one thing -- peace! I feel that there is much that we do not know, and I am hopeful that Israel has not fallen prey to the U.S. because of any aid it has had, as BushCo has succeeded in so-rendering many other societies. I also know that most of the aid has not been governmental, but more personal in nature. I just know one thing in respect to it all -- that if Israel does not defend itself -- it will become yet another "holocaust." Whether or not, they have pursued all the problems confronted it in the proper manner, I cannot say -- I am not sufficiently knowledgeable about what/how/when all that has gone on. Probably, they have made numerous mistakes, as would befall a nation under constant attack.
And lastly, thank you for pointing out that we do, in fact, have a number of groups, sources, that are attempting to refute Ruppert's words -- in a voice of hopefulness for us all.
I'm a little "verklempt," but O.K. as I can be.
Comment # 6 ~ Rusty ~ 08/20/2006 23:43 GMT You're welcome, feline.
Comment # 7 ~ tahoebasha1 ~ 08/20/2006 23:43 GMT Rusty, thank you and thank you for bringing Michael C. Ruppert's article “By the Light of a Burning Bridge” to our attention. I read the entire article. No one on earth could blame this man for his decision and one, I would consider, a wise one. Having lived the life he did where he, personally, viewed outrage and activism, he warns us about the acquiescence that has so prevailed in our current dilemna. Still, he makes efforts -- from afar. He so clairvoyantly reveals the "true" progression of this country in it's path to destruction that it's hard to believe that there are those many who still do not understand.
He mentions Israel and it's government and policies, which he does not condone. I don't feel I am adequately abreast to say whether or not their policies have been/are good or bad -- probably, a little of both. On that, I can only say one thing, I think that Israel after years and years of terrorism upon it would wish for just one thing -- peace! I feel that there is much that we do not know, and I am hopeful that Israel has not fallen prey to the U.S. because of any aid it has had, as BushCo has succeeded in so-rendering many other societies. I also know that most of the aid has not been governmental, but more personal in nature. I just know one thing in respect to it all -- that if Israel does not defend itself -- it will become yet another "holocaust." Whether or not, they have pursued all the problems confronted it in the proper manner, I cannot say -- I am not sufficiently knowledgeable about what/how/when all that has gone on. Probably, they have made numerous mistakes, as would befall a nation under constant attack.
And lastly, thank you for pointing out that we do, in fact, have a number of groups, sources, that are attempting to refute Ruppert's words -- in a voice of hopefulness for us all.
I'm a little "verklempt," but O.K. as I can be.
Comment # 8 ~ Rusty ~ 08/20/2006 23:44 GMT You're welcome again, feline.
Comment # 9 ~ Rusty ~ 08/20/2006 23:46 GMT You are welcome twice, too, Tahoe. This article is getting twice as much feedback as I expected. I should write about Missouri progressives more often.
Comment # 10 ~ tahoebasha1 ~ 08/20/2006 23:48 GMT attempting to undo the underlining -- I hope it works. Also, I don't know how I managed to post twice. Sorry, friends, unintentional, I assure you.
Comment # 11 ~ tahoebasha1 ~ 08/20/2006 23:50 GMT I am attempting to correct this situation. Don't know what happened -- probably, my fault. Sorry!
Comment # 12 ~ tahoebasha1 ~ 08/20/2006 23:52 GMT Voila! Succes!
Comment # 13 ~ tahoebasha1 ~ 08/20/2006 23:53 GMT Missouri only!
Comment # 14 ~ Alma ~ 08/21/2006 00:03 GMT Yeah, Tahoe! I knew you could do it. ;)
Comment # 15 ~ Rusty ~ 08/21/2006 00:03 GMT Tahoe, as much as we respect Ruppert, I think we both disagree with some of his views about Israel. We've discussed the plight of the Israeli people several times, beseiged as they are by Hamas and Hezbollah and the irrational hatred of millions of Muslims.
The Israeli people have built a thriving, prosperous democracy and only want to live in peace. The vast majority of Muslims only want to live in peace.
Religious extremism and corporate fascism are the greatest threats to Jews, Muslims, Christians, and every other human being, no matter what their beliefs.
Comment # 16 ~ Rusty ~ 08/21/2006 00:05 GMT I will write about Illinois and Michigan progressive activists ASAP, Tahoe and Alma.
Comment # 17 ~ tahoebasha1 ~ 08/21/2006 00:32 GMT #15 - Rusty,
The Israelis built that thriving, prosperous democracy from a land of "nothing." From hard work and determination, much like the pioneers of our country -- seeking a relief from oppression of "controllers" of the people.
Extremism on any level is dangerous! It is no coincidence that throughout history the "people" have paid the price for their oppressors!
Comment # 18 ~ tahoebasha1 ~ 08/21/2006 00:33 GMT Thanks, Alma, for your constant vote of confidence -- ain't none better than you, dear one!
Comment # 19 ~ tahoebasha1 ~ 08/21/2006 00:34 GMT Illinois and Michigan are awaiting, Rusty!
Comment # 20 ~ tahoebasha1 ~ 08/21/2006 00:36 GMT Illinois and Michigan are awaiting, Rusty!
Comment # 21 ~ Alma ~ 08/21/2006 00:42 GMT Once for each state Tahoe?
Comment # 22 ~ tahoebasha1 ~ 08/21/2006 00:47 GMT Absolutely, Alma, not sure how I posted multiples here -- oh, well, maybe, said twice is better! ;)
Comment # 23 ~ tahoebasha1 ~ 08/21/2006 00:51 GMT In re my #17, Rusty, "controllers" 'of the people'" in the case of Israelis has been a little different -- a people of a certain philosophical persuasion.
Comment # 24 ~ Rusty ~ 08/21/2006 00:52 GMT Illinois and Michigan won't be waiting long, Tahoe. The double comments won't happen if you click X to close the message that pops up after you submit your comment.
Comment # 25 ~ Rusty ~ 08/21/2006 00:56 GMT I see you've redeployed from the double post quagmire, Tahoe. Once again, in #24 as elsewhere, I've "advised" you even though you no longer needed the "advice".
Comment # 26 ~ tahoebasha1 ~ 08/21/2006 00:57 GMT #24 - Rusty,
Thanks for letting us know, Rusty. We'll be awaiting. Double comments? "X" -- what do I know -- will be extremely watchful in the future. Thanks for your expert HTML advice.
Comment # 27 ~ Alma ~ 08/21/2006 01:18 GMT #24 Rusty,
What message popping up after you post a comment are you talking about? I don't get anything like that when I post here.
Comment # 28 ~ Rusty ~ 08/21/2006 01:31 GMT Alma, I see a message pop up after I click "Submit" and before it gets posted. If I click "OK" my comment gets posted twice. So I close the pop up message by clicking "X" to close it and then my comment gets posted once.
Comment # 29 ~ Alma ~ 08/21/2006 01:49 GMT Thanks for the explaination. My pop-up blocker must stop it.
Comment # 30 ~ Patriot ~ 08/21/2006 13:18 GMT There is no popup programmed into this system. Rusty must have a rogue popup... or a ghost.
Comment # 31 ~ Patriot ~ 08/21/2006 13:22 GMT #17 Tahoe said "The Israelis built that thriving, prosperous democracy from a land of "nothing." From hard work and determination, much like the pioneers of our country -- seeking a relief from oppression of "controllers" of the people."
I doubt that the Palestinians would consider their country "nothing" before the Israelis "settled" in it and pushed them out against their will.
Comment # 32 ~ tahoebasha1 ~ 08/21/2006 14:56 GMT #31 - Patriot,
Not quite so, Patriot. For years, the Israelis and Palestinians lived and worked together, and probably could have continued to do so (many Palestinians still do today, in fact, work in Israel) had it not been for the chamelion-like leader Arafat, who only feigned efforts to harness the terrorist activities of the Palestinian Liberation Organization, Hamas, etc. The plight of a "people" is generally the direct result of its leader. I have great empathy for the Palestinian people and am sorry for conditions their leadership has caused them. Could you live next door to someone that took constant swipes at your existence -- and do nothing?
Comment # 33 ~ Alma ~ 08/21/2006 15:16 GMT #30 Patriot,
Maybe Rusty is hallucinating. He might have caught it from Stuffy awhile back on Conyersblog.
#32 Tahoe,
You are quite right about there being peace at first. The Palestinians even set aside land for the Israelis. Peace only lasted a few years until about 1947.
Comment # 34 ~ Rusty ~ 08/21/2006 16:53 GMT Arafat was the worst enemy the Palestinian people ever had. What Bush has done to America. Arafat did to Palestine, except multiply the damage by 100X.
Register. After registration, there's no need to login to post here.
|
